These brisk spring days can be really confusing for a cook. On the one hand, we're psyched for salads and iced coffee, but then there are days, like a few Wednesdays ago, when it's pouring rain and you're freezing. Enter my Coq au Vin (chicken stewed in wine).
On that chilly day, I happened to have enough ingredients to pass for a classic Coq au Vin — chicken thighs, dried porcini mushrooms, a red onion, pancetta, and red wine. What I didn't have was time.
Is it the French name that makes people, myself included, think the dish is going to take all day? It won't. Though some time is usually taken up doing things like blanching the bacon, skimming the fat, and reducing the sauce, I pushed things a bit. In just about thirty minutes, dinner was served. Much of that thirty minutes is when the dish is simmering, so you can set the table, start a load of laundry, read a New Yorker article, or just stare into space.
Imagine: Coq au Vin could be your new weeknight go-to meal.
It is possible to make this dish with any part of the chicken; I like the thighs because they are succulent and nestle into a pot nicely. If you have fresh mushrooms and want to make a super-classic version of the dish, add them to the sauce before reducing, just as the recipe is written for the dried mushrooms. Pearl onions are what you'll usually find in Coq au Vin, but they require a few extra steps, so for something equally tasty and not nearly as laborious, use any standard onion or a few shallots.
Coq au Vin is usually served over wide egg noodles, but I like it with a few hunks of baguette and good butter. Roasted potatoes also make a good side dish.
30-Minute Coq au Vin
Serves 6 to 8
6 to 8 large (about 3 pounds) chicken thighs, skin on
Kosher salt
Freshly ground black pepper
3/4 cup (about 1 ounce) dried wild mushrooms
1/2 cup (about 4 ounces) 1/2-inch cubed pancetta or bacon
1 large red or yellow onion, chopped into 1/2-inch pieces
2 medium carrots, cut into large bite-size pieces
5 large cloves garlic, peeled and gently smashed
2 tablespoons tomato paste
3 cups dry, fruity red wine (zinfandel, burgundy)
1 cup chicken stock
2 bay leaves
4 whole sprigs fresh thyme
6 to 8 whole sprigs fresh parsley, to garnish
Lightly sprinkle the chicken thighs on all sides with salt and pepper. Place the dried mushrooms in a small bowl and pour enough boiling water over to just cover.
Over medium heat in a 4- to 6-quart (large enough to accommodate the chicken) deep skillet or Dutch oven with a lid, brown the pancetta, about 5 to 7 minutes. Add the onions and cook another minute, until onions begin to soften. Turn the heat up to medium-high, add the chicken, skin side down, and cook, turning the pieces as they brown on each side, about 10 minutes total. Drain off any excess fat.
Add the carrots, crushed garlic, tomato paste, wine, chicken stock, bay leaves, and thyme. Lower the heat so that the liquid just barely simmers. Cover and cook about 20 minutes, or until chicken is cooked through and an instant-read thermometer reads 165°F.
Transfer the chicken pieces to a serving platter. Skim any excess fat off the top of the liquid. Remove the mushrooms from their soaking liquid and add them to the pot. Pour the mushroom liquid through a fine sieve or cheese cloth (to remove any grit) and into the pot. Turn the heat up to high and boil the mixture until the sauce is reduced by a third to a half, depending on how much time you have. Remove the bay leaves and thyme.
A few minutes before serving, put the chicken pieces back into the sauce to re-heat. Serve each chicken thigh topped with a ladle of sauce and garnished with chopped parsley leaves or a whole parsley sprig.
(Image credits: Sara Kate Gillingham)
via Recipe | The Kitchn http://ift.tt/1qeRRYe
Put the internet to work for you.
I love doing quick interpretations of some of the long-slow braises! I speed up some a little more by using the pressure cooker.
11.04.10 1:47PMA quick tip re. the pearl onions: you can find them peeled and ready to go in the frozen vegetable section of the supermarket. I usually have a couple of bags in the freezer alongside the peas! Just pop them in at the end and allow them to cook with everything for about 5 mins or so.
I really have to argue this recipe. While the faster process will be close, it will still miss the major notes of the long braising. Coq au Vin shouldn't be rushed, it is too good!
11.04.10 2:31PM@_joecrawford - of course there are benefits to long and slow cooking, that goes without saying. The point here is more that it can be done more quickly with good results.
11.04.10 2:47PMLove the 'cheat', Sara Kate! Reminds me of Sam the Cooking Guy. Use what you have to get the gist of what you crave.
I'll try this tomorrow!
11.04.10 4:15PMLOVE this shortcut. I'm a busy full time working artist with a family who has gotten used to home cooked and good food. But, time is precious and this recipe is great
11.04.10 4:21PMThank you
Nancy
http://ift.tt/1qeRRHs
There is an easier- using boneless, skinless breasts- and definitely equally tasty version on epicurious.com.
11.04.10 11:06PMThanks for this - I'd forgotten what a great, comforting dish coq au vin is. I don't use tomato paste, but I always add a little bit of dark chocolate to the pot, it's surprisingly good.
11.05.10 5:13AMMartha Stewart has a Pressure Cooker version, but you still have to reduce and simmer!
http://ift.tt/1hxBInk
11.05.10 8:31AMMade this for dinner on Sunday night and we thought it turned out really well! I let it simmer until the liquid was reduced by half so that took longer than 30 minutes (closer to an hour) but that was fine.
I took the lardons out of the pot before adding the liquids and added them back when I served it so that they stayed crunchy.
I'd definitely make this again!
11.07.10 11:04PMI made this and it was amazing! It took closer to an hour all told. I've never had traditional coq a vin, but this was so good I may have to try the long version as well. Either way, this version was still worthwhile.
11.08.10 11:48PMWhen I told my French husband I was going to try to make coq au vin for dinner, his reaction was, where did you get rooster from? (coq is rooster in French)...I apologized and corrected myself...we were having 'poulet au vin' for dinner :) needless to say, dinner was delicious, he loved it and he didn't miss the rooster!
11.09.10 12:54AMI thought this wouldn't be as good as the longer cooking traditional method, too. But we made it tonight and I could not believe how amazing it was! The sauce was rich and deeply flavored and tasted like it had been simmering for a full day but it was all ready to eat in under an hour! We used guanciale instead of bacon or pancetta and we used all porcini mushrooms and the results were a perfect 10. Thank you for this delicious shortcut. We will definitely make this again.
11.09.10 10:27PMThis was great - and super easy. The longer it cooks the better it is.
You could make this up to the simmering stage and put it in the refrigerator overnight, say on a Sunday while you're cooking something else. Then heat it up for half an hour and Monday dinner is done too!
12.06.10 1:50PMDelicious! Thanks. I too let it cook a bit longer and used boneless breasts as we don't care for thighs. But a great week night meal.
02.03.11 4:04PMThis is clearly a recipe for people who are bad at math.
Ignoring any prep time, 5-7 minutes plus 10 minutes plus 20 minutes is already well in excess of 30 minutes. At that point, the sauce is still not reduced and the chicken has not been reheated.
D- for failure adhere to the most basic priciples of mathematics.
03.18.13 9:48PMThis looks more like a 45 minute recipe to me--plus prep time. So--dinner in an hour--just like always. And I can't see the point of doing a short cut version of coq au vin.
05.07.14 11:11AMWow. Math much?
05.07.14 12:07PMYeah, I get that this is a quicker version, but why push it and say you can do it in 30 minutes? It's a weeknight dinner, sure, but it will still take an hour if you include the prep and reducing time. I get really tired of people insisting on "no more than 30 minutes" for marketing a recipe. Just tell the truth, we can handle it!
05.07.14 12:23PMMaybe it's just me, but in the photo there looks like a ring of fatty grease at the edge of the bowl. Perhaps skinless thighs would reduce this? Otherwise looks like a great recipe.
05.07.14 12:27PM